Silver

Silver v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Good Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 217·2000 Daily Journal DAR 3163·79 Cal. App. 4th 338·94 Cal. Rptr. 2d 287·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2394
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 24, 2000No. B122889California6,993 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Klein, J.

Plaintiffs and appellants Neil Silver, James Williams, Robert Bennett, Robert Caudill, Johnny Howard, United Transportation Union General Committee of Adjustment (UTU), and Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1277, AFL-CIO (ATU) (collectively, petitioners), appeal a judgment denying their petition for writ of mandate, which petition was directed against defendants and respondents Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), Public Transportation Services Corporation (PTSC), and the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS). (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085.)

The board of the MTA created PTSC, a governmental nonprofit public benefit corporation, and transferred a portion of its workforce to that entity. The petitioners contend PTSC is a sham corporation and is an illegal attempt to evade the MTA’s obligation to cover its employees under Social Security. The trial court found PTSC was formed for a proper purpose, namely, to make PERS retirement benefits available to MTA employees, who are protected in an acquisition from any diminution in wages and benefits. (Pub. Util. Code, § 30753.) In addition, PTSC was established to provide transportation and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.