Griego

Griego v. Superior Court

Good Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 350·2000 Daily Journal DAR 4593·80 Cal. App. 4th 568·95 Cal. Rptr. 2d 351·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3420
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 1, 2000No. B138334California3,121 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Perren, J.

*571 Opinion

The state initiates civil proceedings to declare a person a sexually violent predator (SVP). In exchange for his deposition testimony on certain matters, he receives transactional immunity for those matters and “any of the matters that he may testify to.” Here we conclude that he may not be prosecuted for a crime relating to his deposition testimony.

Facts

The People initiated proceedings to declare petitioner Leonard Griego an SVP. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.) While the petition was pending, the People noticed his deposition.

Griego, claiming the shield of the Fifth Amendment, moved to quash the deposition or, in the alternative, for a protective order. In response, the People represented to the trial court that they would limit their inquiry to: (1) Griego’s current mental illness; (2) his past charged criminal conduct; and (3) an alleged sexual assault upon his half brother. The People asserted that this information was relevant because it would be used by mental health professionals to diagnose and treat Griego for a personality disorder. The deputy district attorney acknowledged that the Fifth Amendment was implicated. He assured the court, however,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.