Hock

Hock v. Gordon-Hock

Good Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 418·2000 Daily Journal DAR 5611·80 Cal. App. 4th 1438·96 Cal. Rptr. 2d 546·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4169
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 30, 2000No. B133047California4,003 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Turner, J.

I. Introduction

Veronica Gordon-Hock appeals from an order, entered on April 15, 1999, denying her Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 473 motion to set aside the further judgment on further reserved issues in favor of her former spouse, Stephan J. Hock. 2 The main issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in failing to grant Veronica relief under the “attorney’s affidavit of fault,” which is a mandatory provision of section 473, subdivision (b). Veronica’s lawyer failed to appéar at the time and place set for trial. Veronica’s lawyer filed a declaration of fault pursuant to section 473, subdivision (b). We conclude that under the facts before us, Veronica’s attorney’s failure to appear at the time set for trial constituted a “default” within the meaning of section 473, subdivision (b). We therefore reverse the order denying the motion pursuant to section 473, subdivision (b).

II. Background

Veronica and Stephan were married on March 12, 1988, and separated on October 7, 1994. Stephan filed a petition for dissolution of the marriage on November 2, 1994. They had one child, who was born on February 1, 1995. A judgment of dissolution was granted on April 24, 1996,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.