Rucker

Rucker v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

Good Law
2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 552·2000 Daily Journal DAR 7719·82 Cal. App. 4th 151·97 Cal. Rptr. 2d 852·65 Cal. Comp. Cases 805
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 13, 2000No. B137562California2,953 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hastings, J.

Injured employee, Alberta Rucker, seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board), denying her demand for advances against permanent disability (PDA), as permitted under Labor Code section 139.5, subdivision (d), and a penalty due to the employer’s failure to pay it, pursuant to Labor Code section 5814. 1 We agree that the Board should have granted her petition for reconsideration, that she established that she was entitled to PDA, and that respondent failed to meet its burden to prove that its failure to pay the additional amount under section 139.5, subdivision (d) was reasonable.

Background

We begin by summarizing the relevant facts in the record of proceedings, which has been reproduced entirely from the Board’s file.

In 1991, petitioner, an employee of respondent, County of Los Angeles, suffered an industrial injury, which caused a 50 percent permanent disability. On December 5, 1995, the parties stipulated to an award of $35,668, payable at $148 per week beginning October 18, 1994. On May 8, 1996, petitioner filed an appeal to the Board of the denial of her claim for vocational rehabilitation maintenance allowance (VRMA), plus…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.