Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Superior Court

Good Law
100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 172·2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 729·2000 Daily Journal DAR 10329·83 Cal. App. 4th 947
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 24, 2000No. B142040California558 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

By petition for a writ of mandate, the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (Department) challenges the juvenile court’s order reinstating the parental rights of *949 Rebecca H., the mother of a child who has been declared a dependent of the court. The record provided in support of the petition establishes the Department is entitled to relief.

At a single proceeding, a hearing for the selection and implementation of a permanent plan (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26) for Jonus S., the juvenile court terminated the parental rights of Jonus’s father and of his mother, real party in interest Rebecca H. The father appealed. Rebecca did not appeal. In the father’s appeal, this court reversed the order terminating his parental rights on the ground he was not properly noticed of the selection and implementation hearing. On remand, the juvenile court reinstated the father’s parental rights and Rebecca’s parental rights as well. This was error, as only the father’s parental rights should have been reinstated. As explained in rule 1463(g) of the California Rules of Court, the purpose of termination of parental rights is to free the dependent child for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.