People v. Superior Court

Good Law
100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 199·2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 732·2000 Daily Journal DAR 10343·83 Cal. App. 4th 951·2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7792
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 2000No. H021486; No. H021543California5,223 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Bamattremanoukian, J.

Allen Douglas Butler and Michael Thomas Cheek were found to be sexually violent predators under the Sexually Violent Predators Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.) 1 and were committed to the custody of the state Department of Mental Health (DMH) for two years. We affirmed those commitments in People v. Butler (1998) 68 *955 Cal.App.4th 421 [ 80 Cal.Rptr.2d 357 ] (Butler I), 2 and People v. Cheek (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 282 [ 89 Cal.Rptr.2d 125 ] (Cheek), review granted December 15, 1999, S083305.

Before Butler’s and Cheek’s initial two-year commitments expired, the district attorney filed petitions to extend their commitments for additional two-year periods. The petitions were each supported by one current evaluation from a DMH clinical psychologist. After the trial court found probable cause to believe that Butler and Cheek were likely to engage in sexually violent predatory criminal behavior upon their release (§ 6602), Butler and Cheek sought relief in this court. We considered the cases together, in Butler v. Superior Court (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 1171 [ 93 Cal.Rptr.2d 468 ] (Butler II). 3 We held that the petitions to extend Butler’s and Cheek’s commitments should…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.