Sacramento County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
102 Cal. Rptr. 2d 523·2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 984·2000 Daily Journal DAR 13617·85 Cal. App. 4th 960·166 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2103
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 22, 2000No. C031927California2,886 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Scotland, J.

At the primary election on June 2, 1998, the voters of Sacramento County approved Measure D and Measure E, both of which dealt with the arbitration of employment disputes between the County of Sacramento and nonsupervisory law enforcement representatives. Measure D passed by 58 percent of the vote, while Measure E passed by 53 percent of the vote.

The difference between the initiatives is that Measure D provides that a decision of the arbitration board is final without need for approval by the board of supervisors or the electorate, whereas Measure E provides that the results of arbitration concerning certain contract provisions are binding only if approved by a majority of the votes cast in a county wide election in which the question of approval or disapproval is presented to the voters.

The Sacramento County Deputy Sheriffs’ Association (the Association), brought a declaratory relief action against the County of Sacramento (the County), contending that Measure E is ineffective because Measure D, approved by the voters at the same election, conflicts with Measure E and received a greater majority of the votes cast. The trial court granted judgment on the pleadings,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.