Garcetti

Garcetti v. Superior Court

Good Law
102 Cal. Rptr. 2d 703·2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 994·2001 Daily Journal DAR 89·85 Cal. App. 4th 1113·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 27
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 29, 2000No. B141817California4,290 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Klein, J.

Gil Garcetti, District Attorney of Los Angeles County, petitions for a writ of mandate to overturn the superior court’s order sustaining a demurrer by Barry Meril Blake (Blake) to the People’s commitment petition under the Sexually Violent Predators Act (SVP Act) (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.) and dismissing the commitment proceedings.

A requisite to a commitment under the SVP Act is that a defendant have been convicted of sexually violent offenses against at least two victims. (§ 6600, subd. (a).) Section 6600, subdivision (a) provides “a conviction resulting in a finding that the person was a mentally disordered sex offender *1116 . . . shall ... be deemed to be a sexually violent offense.” The essential issue presented is whether a conviction of an attempted lewd or lascivious act upon a child under age 14 (hereafter lewd act), resulting in a finding that the defendant was a mentally disordered sex offender (MDSO), qualifies as a prior conviction for purposes of the SVP Act.

We conclude that any conviction resulting in an MDSO finding qualifies as a prior conviction for purposes of the SVP Act. Therefore, the commitment petition is well pled. We reject the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.