Tognazzini

Tognazzini v. San Luis Coastal Unified Sch. Dist.

Good Law
103 Cal. Rptr. 2d 790·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 73·2001 Daily Journal DAR 1209·86 Cal. App. 4th 1053·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 964
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 2001No. B137084California1,919 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Perren, J.

By statute, the state has mandated that all noncertificated school district employees be fingerprinted. (Ed. Code, § 45125.) In conformity with the mandate, the school district tells its employee to comply. But it is the employee who decides when and where to be printed. She elects to do so on a day off. Immediately after being printed, she collides with a motorcycle. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the jury’s finding that she was not acting within the scope of her employment.

*1056 Ryon Alan Tognazzini appeals from the judgment after jury trial in favor of respondent, San Luis Coastal Unified School District (District). District hired Thuy Than Ho as a classroom tutor. Shortly thereafter, Ho’s supervisor told her that she must be fingerprinted as required by state law. Ho was fingerprinted on a day she was not scheduled to work. As she drove home, Ho collided with Tognazzini, injuring him. Tognazzini sued District on the theory that it is vicariously liable for Ho’s conduct.

The jury returned a special verdict finding that Ho was not acting within the scope of her employment at the time of the accident. Accordingly, the court entered judgment in favor of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.