Crowe

People v. Crowe

Good Law
104 Cal. Rptr. 2d 319·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 111·2001 Daily Journal DAR 1759·87 Cal. App. 4th 86·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1405
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 2001No. B137930California4,177 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vogel, J.

Introduction

A jury convicted Calvin Crowe of second degree murder (Pen. Code, §§ 187, 189) 1 and being a felon in possession of a firearm (§ 12021, subd. (a)(1)). The jury found true the sentencing enhancements that defendant personally and intentionally discharged a firearm, killing the victim (§ 12022.53), and that he personally used a firearm (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)(1)). *89 In a separate proceeding, the jury found true the allegation, pled both under the “Three Strikes” law and section 667, subdivision (a), that defendant had suffered a serious felony conviction in 1998 for the grossly negligent discharge of a firearm (§ 246.3) (People v. Crowe (Super. Ct. L.A. County, 1998, No. SA032968)). The court denied defendant’s motion to strike the prior conviction and sentenced him to a term of 55 years to life, plus 5 years.

In an opinion rendered last year after trial was completed in this matter, the California Supreme Court held intent to kill is not an element of voluntary manslaughter. (People v. Lasko (2000) 23 Cal.4th 101 [ 96 Cal.Rptr.2d 441 , 999 P.2d 666 ].) In this case the jury, pursuant to defendant’s request, had been instructed about, inter alia, the lesser…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.