Ajida Technologies, Inc. v. Roos Instruments, Inc.

Bad Law
87 Cal. App. 4th 534
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 1, 2001No. H020311California6,934 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wunderlich, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment confirming an arbitration award. The appeal rests on a claim that the arbitrators exceeded their authority. At issue are two provisions of the award, both drawn from the parties’ terminated agreement and both governing future controversies. The challenged provisions compel further arbitration and permit an award of attorneys’ fees in the event of future disputes over the arbitration award. We conclude that the arbitrators acted within the scope of their powers in including the arbitration and fee provisions in the award. We therefore affirm the judgment.

Facts and Procedural History

The parties to this proceeding are Ajida Technologies, Inc. (respondent) and Roos Instruments, Inc., and Mark Roos (collectively appellant). This *538 dispute arose out of the parties’ 1991 joint marketing and development agreement (JMDA or the agreement).

The agreement contemplated that appellant and respondent would work together to develop and market a microwave measurement system for testing integrated circuits. Under the terms of the agreement, each party bore equal responsibility for the venture. By the same token, the parties were to share equally in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.