Gray

People v. Gray

Good Law
104 Cal. Rptr. 2d 848·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 165·2001 Daily Journal DAR 2472·87 Cal. App. 4th 781·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1952
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 7, 2001No. B142928California2,916 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Perren, J.

A prosecutor exercises peremptory challenges excusing the only three African-American males in the venire. Defendant’s motion to compel the prosecution to justify these challenges is denied by the trial judge who rules that African-American males do not constitute a cognizable class for purposes of Wheeler. 1 The trial judge also refuses to permit the prosecutor to respond to the defense motion. The court erred in both of these rulings. Here we hold that African-American males are a cognizable class under Wheeler.

*784 Michael Gray appeals from his conviction after jury trial for burglary. (Pen. Code, § 459.) 2 The jury found true the allegations that he has three prior serious felony convictions and that he served a prior felony prison term. (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 667.5, subd. (b), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d).) The court sentenced Gray to prison for 26 years to life. In addition to his Wheeler claim, Gray contends the court abused its discretion by refusing to strike priors under Romero 3 or declaring the instant offense to be a misdemeanor under section 17, subdivision (b).

The court’s Wheeler error is reversible per se. 5 Accordingly, we reverse and do not consider…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.