Roger E. Smith, Inc. v. SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc.

Good Law
107 Cal. Rptr. 2d 424·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 403·2001 Daily Journal DAR 5395·89 Cal. App. 4th 638·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4409
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 23, 2001No. A088522California4,920 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Parrilli, J.

Which statute of limitations applies to a general contractor’s claims against an architect and construction manager for economic losses sustained due to their alleged professional negligence during construction? Instead of the two-year statute governing claims for breach of an oral contract (Code Civ. Proc., § 339, subd. 1), the general contractor in this case urges us to apply the four-year statute of limitations for patent deficiencies in construction (Code Civ. Proc., § 337.1). We conclude that Code of Civil Procedure section 337.1 does not encompass such claims and affirm the summary judgment entered in the trial court.

Background

On October 19, 1993, Roger E. Smith, Inc., doing business as Resco Construction Company (Resco), contracted with the County of Humboldt (County) to constmct a library. The County retained Robert J. Gianelli Architects (Gianelli) as the architect on the project and SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc. (SHN) as the construction manager. During construction, Resco encountered delays and increased costs due to errors in Gianelli’s plans and specifications and SHN’s failure to coordinate and inspect the project in a competent and timely…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.