Thompson

Thompson v. Superior Court

Good Law
110 Cal. Rptr. 2d 89·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 602·2001 D.A.R. 7975·2001 Daily Journal DAR 7975·91 Cal. App. 4th 144
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 31, 2001No. B144625California6,104 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Aldrich, J.

*147 Opinion

In this case, we must decide whether the People are required to present evidence supporting “Three Strikes” prior conviction allegations at preliminary hearings. Petitioner Jermaine Marquice Thompson was charged with possession of cocaine. The complaint also alleged he had suffered two prior convictions within the meaning of the Three Strikes law. While acknowledging that California courts have held proof of strike priors is not required at preliminary hearings, Thompson argues that in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000) 530 U.S. 466 [ 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 ] 9Apprendi), the prior conviction allegations were elements of the charged offense, and therefore were required to be proven at the preliminary hearing. Thompson additionally urges that requiring proof of strike priors at preliminary hearings would further public policy objectives. Finally, he contends that, because prior conviction allegations that serve to elevate a charged offense from a misdemeanor to a felony are proved at preliminary hearings, failure to require similar proof of strike priors violates equal protection principles. Thompson seeks a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.