Placer Ranch Partners v. County of Placer

Good Law
111 Cal. Rptr. 2d 577·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 693·2001 Daily Journal DAR 9482·91 Cal. App. 4th 1336·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7657
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 30, 2001No. C032561California2,056 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hull, J.

In what is often perceived to be the typical case involving the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq. [further undesignated statutory references are to the Public Resources Code]), a zealous citizens group challenges the approval of a development project by asserting that a government entity failed to consider possible adverse environmental effects of the projects, or otherwise failed to follow mandated CEQA procedures. This is not that case. Here, it is the developers who invoke CEQA’s protections to challenge the government agency’s actions.

After receiving input on a draft environmental impact report (DEIR) for its general plan update, the Placer County Board of Supervisors (the County) opted to modify its plans and, instead of permitting the development of four new towns in rural portions of the county, decided to meet forecasted housing needs through the use of in-fill projects in existing towns. This option, which had been presented as an alternative in the DEIR, was incorporated into the final environmental impact report (FEIR).

Plaintiffs Placer Ranch Partners, Placer Ranch 160, and Stanford Ranch, Inc., developers for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.