Woodson

People ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Woodson

Good Law
113 Cal. Rptr. 2d 559·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 2003·2001 Daily Journal DAR 12107·93 Cal. App. 4th 954·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9704
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 14, 2001No. G024913California2,423 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Moore, J.

The Department of Transportation (Caltrans) filed a complaint in eminent domain against Bertrand H. Woodson and Besse M. Woodson as trustees of the B. H. & B. M. Woodson Family Trust dated May 16, 1990 (Woodsons). The jury awarded the Woodsons $1,876,750 as just compensation for their property. This figure exceeded Caltrans’s final offer by $476,750. Nonetheless, the Woodsons’ motion for litigation expenses was denied. The Woodsons claim the trial court erred in denying their request for litigation expenses, because Caltrans’s final offer of compensation was unreasonable. We agree, and reverse and remand.

I

Facts

In furtherance of a freeway-widening project, Caltrans sought title to the Woodsons’ two-acre mobilehome park. Caltrans filed a complaint in eminent domain. As trial approached, the Woodsons made a final demand of $1,695,000 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1250.410. Caltrans made a final offer of $1,400,000. The last business day preceding trial, Caltrans made an ex parte application to continue the trial date. The motion was granted and the trial was ultimately rescheduled for three and a half months later. Before the trial date, the Woodsons made…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.