Roe

Roe v. State of California

Good Law
113 Cal. Rptr. 2d 900·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 2728·2001 Daily Journal DAR 12549·94 Cal. App. 4th 64·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10063
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 30, 2001No. A093755California4,398 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kline, J.

*67 Opinion

John Roe filed a complaint claiming the Office of Real Estate Appraisers violated a confidentiality clause in the stipulation by which an administrative disciplinary action against him was settled. The trial court sustained respondents’ demurrer without leave to amend. Appellant contends the trial court abused its discretion because all his causes of action showed entitlement to relief or could have been amended to do so. We reverse.

Statement of The Case and Facts

On January 6, 2000, appellant filed his first amended complaint for breach of contract, breach of mandatory duty and declaratory and injunctive relief against the State of California (State), the Office of Real Estate Appraisers (OREA) and individual defendants. In his cause of action for breach of contract, appellant alleged that on or about December 23, 1999, he entered into a confidential “Stipulation and Waiver” with the State and OREA in settlement of an inquiry and investigation of appellant by the State and OREA. Under the settlement, appellant waived his right to contest any charges against him, without admitting them, and agreed to certain educational and other requirements, while the State and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.