Piscioneri

Piscioneri v. City of Ontario

Good Law
116 Cal. Rptr. 2d 38·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 200·2002 Daily Journal DAR 1237·95 Cal. App. 4th 1037
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 2002No. E029472California6,237 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hollenhorst, J.

The trial court granted a petition for writ of mandate which commands defendant City of Ontario (City) to immediately schedule a hearing on plaintiff’s applications for a disability retirement. The City appeals.

Facts

Mr. James Piscioneri was employed by the City as a firefighter from 1984 through 1987. On November 20, 1987, he filed an application for a disability retirement with the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS). PERS then notified the City to make a disability determination within six months, as required by former Government Code section 21025.1 (now § 21157).

On January 5, 1989, the city manager denied the application. The notice of determination states: “Although it has previously been determined medically and legally that Mr. Piscioneri has sustained a permanent disability as the result of his injuries on March 18, 1985 and May 22, 1985, constituting a psychiatric disability in the form of a slight phobia with respect to entering burning buildings, Mr. Piscioneri appears to be fully capable of performing the duties of Paramedic Coordinator which is a regular safety position in the Fire Department. Such position was offered to Mr. Piscioneri,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.