Winter

Winter v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
117 Cal. Rptr. 2d 679·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 2557·2002 Daily Journal DAR 2771·96 Cal. App. 4th 1058·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2271
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 8, 2002No. B148898California2,653 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Epstein, J.

In this case, we conclude that the probationary period for a Los Angeles police officer was not extended by the period of time he was assigned home while a complaint against him was investigated. Since his probationary period expired before he was formally terminated, he was entitled to a board of rights proceeding. We reverse the order of the trial court.

*1060 Factual and Procedural Summary

Paul Winter was sworn in as a Los Angeles police officer on December 26, 1995. Under section 109(c) of the Los Angeles City Charter then in effect, 1 his term of probation was 18 months. Based on his hire date, Winter’s probationary term ordinarily would have expired on June 25, 1997 if no absences occurred to extend the probationary period.

In March 1996, while off duty, Winter and a female neighbor went to a bar in Long Beach where she became intoxicated. They returned to Winter’s apartment. The neighbor later reported to the Long Beach Police Department that Winter had raped her.

A personnel complaint was initiated against Winter. After a review of the complaint, Winter’s commanding officer, Captain Richard Roupoli, found the complaint “Not Resolved,” and sent it up the chain…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.