Sacramento County Department of Health & Human Services v. Michelle R.

Good Law
118 Cal. Rptr. 2d 376·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 3043·2002 Daily Journal DAR 3781·97 Cal. App. 4th 613·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3126
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 19, 2002No. C039302California1,485 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Davis, J.

Michelle R. and Derrick E. (appellants), the parents of Raymond E. (the minor), appeal from an order of the juvenile court terminating their parental rights. 1 Appellants claim the court erred when it failed to find that it would be detrimental to the minor to sever their relationship with him. Michelle separately claims that the court erred when it failed to properly consider the effect of adoption on the minor’s relationship with his brother. We disagree and will affirm the order terminating parental rights.

Effective January 1, 2002, the Legislature amended section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1), creating an additional exception to the termination of parental rights upon a finding of adoptability. Under new subdivision (c)(1)(E), *615 the juvenile court may find a compelling reason for determining that termination of parental rights would be detrimental to the minor where “[tjhere would be substantial interference with a child’s sibling relationship, taking into consideration the nature and extent of the relationship, including, but not limited to, whether the child was raised with a sibling in the same home, whether the child shared significant common experiences or has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.