Gofman

People v. Gofman

Good Law
119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 122·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 3998·2002 Daily Journal DAR 4268·97 Cal. App. 4th 965·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3415
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 18, 2002No. B139753California3,595 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hastings, J.

The People appeal from trial court orders dismissing various counts of an indictment pursuant to Penal Code section 656. 1 The indictment was brought against respondents Inna Gofman, Irma E. Palacios, Bruce Ankrom, Paul Shvartsburd, Dmitry Goldman and Michael Rosenberg 2 (respondents), among others. The underlying factual basis for the indictment is an alleged conspiracy, and various overt actions taken by respondents, to defraud insurance companies with false claims stemming from eight “staged” automobile accidents. Six of the “staged” collisions also formed the factual basis for a prior federal indictment against the same respondents alleging one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and numerous counts for the substantive offenses of mail fraud. Respondents entered guilty pleas on certain of the federal counts, which established the foundation for the motions to dismiss brought pursuant to section 656.

We conclude that the trial court did not err in dismissing the state counts charging conspiracy and insurance fraud which were based on the same “acts” to which respondents pled guilty in the federal action. Accordingly, we affirm the orders of dismissal as to those…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.