Kings County Department of Human Services v. Victor B.
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Victor B. appeals from an order terminating his parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26) to his daughters, Megan and Heather. 1 He does not claim the juvenile court committed prejudicial error at the section 366.26 hearing. Appellate counsel in fact originally filed a statement with this court under In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952 [ 55 Cal.Rptr.2d 771 , 920 P.2d 716 ] that there were no arguable issues. Nevertheless, appellant urges this court to reverse based on subsequent events. Namely, the *13 children’s adoptive placement has been terminated. On review, we will affirm.
Procedural History
In light of the limited scope of this appeal, the record may be briefly summarized. Megan, bom in 1991, and Heather, bom in 1993, have been dependent children in out-of-home placement since 1996. The children originally came to the juvenile court’s attention because their mother failed to protect them from her boyfriend who sexually molested Heather. Meanwhile, the children could not be placed with their father because he had previously physically abused Megan. Despite extensive reunification efforts, neither parent regained custody of the children.