People v. Williams

Good Law
121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 464·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4318·2002 Daily Journal DAR 7119·99 Cal. App. 4th 696·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5662
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 24, 2002No. C036925California1,442 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Blease, J.

*698 Opinion

Defendant Steven Mark Williams appeals from the judgment of conviction after a jury found him guilty of robbery, five prior “strikes” felony convictions, one of which was based upon a 1992 burglary conviction, two prior serious felony conviction enhancements, one based on the same 1992 burglary conviction, and a bail enhancement. He received a sentence of 37 years to life imprisonment.

On appeal, he raises six claims of error: allowing his wife to be called as a witness, excluding expert psychiatric testimony, incompetence of trial counsel, cumulative error, refusal to strike four prior felony convictions under People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497 [ 53 Cal.Rptr.2d 789 , 917 P.2d 628 ] (hereafter Romero), and imposition of cruel or unusual punishment.

Additionally, respondent seeks to concede that the trial court erroneously imposed a five-year term on a prior serious felony conviction enhancement pursuant to Penal Code section 667, subdivision (a), for the 1992 burglary conviction because the jury failed to return a verdict form for the enhancement allegation. We disagree.

In the published portion of the opinion we conclude the jury made a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.