Department of Fair Employment & Housing v. Superior Court

Good Law
121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 615·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4327·2002 Daily Journal DAR 7441·99 Cal. App. 4th 896·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5861
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 28, 2002No. F040070California2,699 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

* On February 13, 2001, a complaint was filed with the petitioner Department of Fair Employment and Housing (petitioner or Department). The complaint alleged discrimination based upon race (African-American) and marital status (single). Regenia Cain (Cain) alleged discrimination based upon race and marital status. Cain had spoken with real party in interest Nancy Keller (Keller), a property manager for real party in interest Mattox Trust (Mattox), with regard to a rental property. According to the complaint, the interview went well until Keller learned that Cain, an African-American, intended to live at the rental property with another *900 woman who is Caucasian. Cain alleged that after learning of Cain’s proposed living arrangement, Keller’s attitude and demeanor toward her changed. Keller expressed her preference to rent to a married couple, which Keller explained to Cain as being “tenants related by blood.” Cain left the premises without filling out an application.

On November 16, 2001, a subpoena duces tecum was served upon Keller. The following information was requested: (1) the rental application and rental agreement for the current tenant of 2228 Northridge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.