Brown

Brown v. Superior Court

Good Law
101 Cal. App. 4th 313·124 Cal. Rptr. 2d 43·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4515·2002 Daily Journal DAR 9515
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 19, 2002No. D039525California2,921 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

McIntyre, J.

*317 Opinion

William Maurice Brown has petitioned this court for a writ of mandate directing the superior court to vacate its order requiring him to submit to periodic polygraph examinations at his own expense as a condition of probation. We issued an order to show cause and a temporary stay. We conclude Brown has not demonstrated that periodic polygraph testing is per se invalid in this case. However, we hold the trial court abused its discretion in (1) imposing a polygraph testing condition without restrictions regarding the questions that may be asked by the examiner, and (2) requiring Brown to pay for such testing as a condition of probation.

Accordingly, we issue a writ of mandate directing the trial court to vacate its order imposing periodic polygraph testing at Brown’s expense and to enter an order imposing periodic polygraph testing limited to questions relevant to the crime for which Brown was convicted and the completion of his court-mandated stalking therapy program. Payment of the costs of such testing shall not be included as a condition of probation. Rather, before the court may order Brown to pay any or all of the reasonable costs of the polygraph testing, it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.