Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
102 Cal. App. 4th 85·124 Cal. Rptr. 2d 911·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4653·2002 Daily Journal DAR 10825·19 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 444
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 2002No. B151027California2,503 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Epstein, J.

In this declaratory relief action, we conclude that the procedure for administrative challenge to a punitive reduction in pay grade or deselection from a bonus position for an employee of the Los Angeles Police Department (Department) does not satisfy the due process requirements of the federal and state Constitutions and does not comply with the mandates of the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act. (Gov. Code, § 3300 et seq.)

Factual and Procedural Summary

The conditions under which public safety officers employed by the Department occupy advanced pay grades or bonus positions, and the conditions under which they may be reassigned from those positions are contained in the Los Angeles Police Department Manual (Department Manual). 1

Section 763.55 of the Department Manual provides that an officer in an advanced pay grade position may be reassigned to a lower pay grade within his or her classification when one of four conditions exist: an officer requests reassignment; an officer completes a fixed tour of duty in a position; a position is eliminated; or “When an officer clearly demonstrates his/her failure or inability to satisfactorily perform the duties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.