Bias

Bias v. Wright

Good Law
103 Cal. App. 4th 811·127 Cal. Rptr. 2d 137·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4984·2002 Daily Journal DAR 12985·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11203
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 15, 2002No. G029720California3,858 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Fybel, J.

Plaintiff Valerie Bias appeals the entry of judgment under

Code of Civil Procedure section 998 (all further statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise indicated). In this personal injury action, Bias served defendant Michelle D. Wright with a written offer to compromise under section 998. Wright claims Bias’s offer was orally accepted on her behalf. Later that same day, Wright faxed to Bias a written confirmation of the oral acceptance entitled “notice of acceptance.” Although Bias’s offer was silent as to costs, Wright’s notice of acceptance imposed the added condition that the parties bear their own costs. Wright filed that notice as proof of acceptance of Bias’s offer. Wright moved to enforce the purported settlement agreement under section 998, and after hearing argument and receiving evidence, the trial court granted Wright’s motion and entered judgment.

We conclude the trial court erred by granting Wright’s motion and entering judgment; therefore, we reverse. We hold: (1) undisputed oral acceptance of a section 998 offer followed by written proof of acceptance is permitted unless the offer requires another mode of acceptance; (2)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.