Sacramento County Department of Health & Human Services v. Glenda S.

Good Law
103 Cal. App. 4th 1193·127 Cal. Rptr. 2d 398·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 5050·2002 Daily Journal DAR 13357·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11522
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 26, 2002No. C041290California2,072 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Hull, J.

Glenda S., mother of the minor, appeals from orders terminating her parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 366.26, 395; further undesignated statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.) Appellant contends there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s finding that the minor was likely to be adopted; all orders following the dispositional order were void for failure to comply with section 249; and the *1195 record lacks evidence to support the juvenile court’s finding that she was properly noticed of the section 366.26 hearing. We affirm the judgment (orders).

Facts and Procedural History

On May 9, 2001, the Sacramento County Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) filed a petition, alleging among other things that both appellant and the minor tested positive for cocaine when the minor was bom. The petition also alleged that appellant had previously given birth to a child who tested positive for drugs. At the time of the section 366.26 hearing, that minor was in the custody of the maternal grandmother under a guardianship.

At the detention hearing held on May 10, 2001, the juvenile court ordered that the infant minor be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.