Harris

Harris v. Grimes

Good Law
104 Cal. App. 4th 180·127 Cal. Rptr. 2d 791·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 5115·2002 Daily Journal DAR 13904·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11855
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 9, 2002No. B149866California3,456 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Rubin, J.

*183 Opinion

Appellant Lorine Harris appeals from the judgment on the pleadings in her legal malpractice lawsuit against respondent Milton Grimes. After review, we reverse and remand.

Procedural and Factual Background

In March 1989, Gardena Police Officer David Mathieson shot and killed appellant Lorine Harris’s unarmed son during the nighttime execution of a search warrant. Appellant alleges Mathieson accidentally fired his gun when a flash-bang grenade used by the police as they forced their way into the home startled Mathieson. 1 In January 1990, appellant filed wrongful death complaints against Mathieson in both federal and state court. 2 Each complaint alleged causes of action for negligence under state law and for civil rights violations under federal law. Mathieson demurred to the state court lawsuit on the ground it was duplicative of the federal lawsuit. 3 In response, appellant dismissed her state court complaint without prejudice.

Appellant’s federal civil rights claim eventually went to trial, shorn by the court’s edict of the negligence claim. The court explained that it feared trying both claims would confuse the jury because they involved “contradictory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.