People ex rel. Lockyer v. Fremont Life Insurance

Good Law
104 Cal. App. 4th 508·128 Cal. Rptr. 2d 463·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 5176·2002 Daily Journal DAR 14261·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 12142
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 18, 2002No. B139066California10,264 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Todd, J.

Introduction

In a bench trial the court found Fremont Life Insurance Company (appellant) had violated Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq., the “unfair competition law,” in connection with the sale of certain annuity policies. The trial court imposed approximately $2.5 million in civil penalties, granted injunctive relief, and required appellant to offer restitution. Appellant contends that the civil penalties should be reversed as an abuse of discretion and a violation of constitutional due process; that the restitution provisions should be reversed because not all consumers were harmed by appellant’s violations and on the ground that the restitution order constitutes an excessive, double punishment; and that the restitution notification requirements should be modified. We affirm the judgment.

*512 Background

Appellant concedes that substantial evidence supports the findings of the trial court. The following factual summary is based on the statement of decision.

Appellant and the Alliance for Mature Americans (AMA) “combined in various ways unlawfully to sell inter vivos trusts and annuities primarily to senior citizens.” AMA first solicited potential…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.