People v. Superior Court

Good Law
104 Cal. App. 4th 692·128 Cal. Rptr. 2d 372·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 5188·2002 Daily Journal DAR 14375·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 12242
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 19, 2002No. H023966California3,761 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Rushing, J.

Introduction

In this petition for a writ of mandate, the People seek to vacate the trial court’s order granting real party in interest, defendant Angelica Natasha Martinez, probation and drug treatment under Proposition 36, the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000. Defendant was granted drug treatment and probation after she pleaded guilty to nonviolent drug possession offenses and admitted having a 1987 prior strike conviction. According to the People, defendant was not eligible for drug treatment and probation because she has a 1987 prior strike conviction and committed a felony weapons offense within five years immediately preceding her commission of the 2001 nonviolent drug possession offenses. (Pen. Code, § 1210.1, subd. (b)(1).) 1 We agree that the trial court erred and will therefore issue a peremptory writ of mandate.

Factual and Procedural Background

A. Defendant’s Current Offenses and Conviction Record

Defendant was charged with one felony count of possessing cocaine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a)), one misdemeanor count of being under the influence of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11550, subd. (a)), and one misdemeanor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.