Ormiston

People v. Ormiston

Good Law
105 Cal. App. 4th 676·129 Cal. Rptr. 2d 567·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 89·2003 Daily Journal DAR 853·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 710
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 2003No. A094813California6,315 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Swager, J.

Appellant was convicted following a trial before the court of three counts of manufacturing methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379.6, subd. (a)), three counts of possession of the components to manufacture methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11383, subd. (c)(1)), two counts of possession of hydriotic acid to manufacture methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11383, subd. (c)(2)), one count of transporting methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379, subd. (a)), one count of possession of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11357, subd. (b)), and two counts of possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)). The trial court also found that two enhancements for committing offenses while released on bail or own recognizance (Pen. Code, § 12022.1) were true. 1 Appellant was sentenced to a total of 10 years and four months in state prison.

He claims in this appeal that no evidence in support of the conviction -for transportation of methamphetamine was presented, a confidential informant should have been disclosed, and the enhancements under section 12022.1 cannot be imposed for commission of offenses while in drug diversion. We find that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.