Moser

Moser v. Ratinoff

Good Law
105 Cal. App. 4th 1211·130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 198·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 138·2003 Daily Journal DAR 1320·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 987
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 2003No. B153258California5,552 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Mosk, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Christian Moser (Moser) and defendant and respondent Joanne Ratinoff (Ratinoff) participated in an organized, long-distance bicycle ride on public highways involving hundreds of participants. Moser signed an “Accident Waiver and Release of Liability” form for the benefit of the event holders, sponsors and organizers in which Moser expressly assumed the risk of various injuries, including those caused by other participants. During the ride, Ratinoff swerved into Moser, causing him to crash and sustain injuries. Moser sued Ratinoff for general negligence. Ratinoff filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that a collision between bicycle riders was an inherent risk in the ride, and *1215 therefore the action was barred by the primary assumption of risk doctrine enunciated in Knight v. Jewett (1992) 3 Cal.4th 296 [ 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 2 , 834 P.2d 696 ] (Knight). Moser opposed the motion on the grounds that the primary assumption of risk doctrine did not apply because the collision was not an inherent risk of the activity and because Ratinoff s violation of provisions of the California Vehicle Code precluded application of the doctrine. The trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.