Scognamillo

Scognamillo v. Herrick

Bad Law
106 Cal. App. 4th 1139·131 Cal. Rptr. 2d 393·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 361·2003 Daily Journal DAR 2791·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2215
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 10, 2003No. B155744California4,027 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Vogel, J.

Introduction

In this case arising out of an automobile accident, defendants and appellants Larry Herrick and White Knight Limousine Service appeal from a default judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent Michael Scognamillo. Defendants contend that the trial court’s entry of default is void because Scognamillo failed to file a statement of damages with the court, although defendants were served with the required statement. Defendants further contend that the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendants’ motion for relief from default as they demonstrated excusable neglect. We reject both of these contentions.

Defendants further argue that the judgment must be reversed because a portion of the damage award was not supported by sufficient evidence, and because the trial court failed to reduce to present cash value the portion of the award representing future medical expenses and lost earnings. We agree with these contentions and we therefore reverse a portion of the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

In late March 2000, Scognamillo and Herrick were involved in a car accident while Herrick was in the course and scope of his employment for White…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.