Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Robert G.

Good Law
109 Cal. App. 4th 939·135 Cal. Rptr. 2d 680·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 861·2003 Daily Journal DAR 6418·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5090
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 2003No. B161963California857 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Mosk, J.

*941 Opinion

Introduction

Robert G. (father) appeals from an order terminating his parental rights to Aaliyah. He contends that his parental rights should not have been terminated because there was insufficient evidence to establish that the adoptive parents are capable of meeting Aaliyah’s needs and that they have no prior referrals for child abuse or neglect. He also contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s finding that the Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A) exception did not apply. 1 In addition, father argues that the termination order must be reversed because the legally required affirmative inquiry was not made as to whether Aaliyah has Indian heritage. We affirm the order terminating father’s parental rights. In the published portion of this opinion we discuss whether a sufficient inquiry was made as to whether or not the child has Indian heritage.

Factual and Procedural Background *

Discussion

*

Indian Child Welfare Act

Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) stated in its petition application that Aaliyah did not have Indian heritage, and it continued to state in its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.