County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Edison Co.

Good Law
112 Cal. App. 4th 1108·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1588·2003 Daily Journal DAR 11716·5 Cal. Rptr. 3d 575·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9300
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 23, 2003No. B159518California5,694 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Croskey, J.

County of Los Angeles together with City of Long Beach and City of Redondo Beach (collectively County) sued the buyer and seller of two electric power generating plants, alleging underpayment of documentary transfer taxes. The superior court conducted a nonjury trial, determined the value of the real property conveyed, and awarded County a total of $383,843 in damages. County appeals the judgment.

County contends (1) the buyer and seller must pay the full amount demanded in notices of tax delinquency before challenging the amount, but they failed to do so, so County is entitled to judgment in the full amount *1112 demanded as a matter of law, and the buyer and seller can challenge that amount and seek a refund only by filing a claim with the county and then seeking judicial review; (2) if the value of the real property is properly at issue in this action, a decision by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) conclusively establishes the value; (3) the trial court’s value analysis and conclusion are flawed; and (4) County is entitled to prejudgment interest under Civil Code section 3287, subdivision (a), and a penalty assessment under a Redondo Beach ordinance.

We conclude…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.