Redante

Redante v. Yockelson

Good Law
112 Cal. App. 4th 1351·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1622·2003 Daily Journal DAR 11897·6 Cal. Rptr. 3d 10
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2003No. D041480California1,994 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Huffman, J.

Plaintiff Lindsel Ateur Redante appeals a summary judgment in favor of defendants Alan Yockelson, Appellate Defenders, Inc., and its Executive Director Elaine Alexander (collectively Yockelson) on Redante’s complaint for legal malpractice. Redante sued Yockelson, his appointed criminal defense attorney, for negligence in failing to timely file a habeas corpus petition and failing to raise all arguable issues on appeal. The court granted summary judgment because Redante could not maintain a cause of action for legal malpractice against Yockelson without first establishing his actual innocence in a postconviction judicial proceeding. We affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A jury convicted Redante of 11 counts of oral copulation with a minor (Pen. Code, § 288a, subd. (b)(1)), 1 two counts of inducing a person under the age of 17 to engage in nude modeling (§ 311.4, subd. (c)), two counts of sodomy (§ 289, subd. (a)) and one count of possessing photographs of a person under the age of 17 engaging in or simulating sexual conduct. (§ 311.2, subd. (d).) Redante testified in his own defense at trial, essentially admitting he committed all the sex acts but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.