Brenner

Brenner v. City of El Cajon

Good Law
113 Cal. App. 4th 434·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1712·2003 Daily Journal DAR 12479·6 Cal. Rptr. 3d 316·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9946
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 10, 2003No. D040579California3,839 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

McDonald, J.

Appellant Shirley Brenner was injured when struck by a car as she was walking across Chase Avenue in the City of El Cajon (City). Brenner sued City and, after demurrers were sustained to her original and first amended complaints, filed a second amended complaint alleging City was liable for a dangerous condition on public property. City’s demurrer to Brenner’s second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. Brenner asserts her second amended complaint adequately pleads facts showing a dangerous condition of public property; alternatively, she asserts it was an abuse of discretion to refuse her the opportunity to again amend her complaint.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On August 21, 2000, Brenner was walking across Chase Avenue near its intersection with Estes Street in the City. While crossing the street, she was struck by a car and suffered significant injuries.

A. The Prior Iterations of the Complaint

Brenner’s original complaint as against City pleaded a single claim for negligence. She alleged that City negligently “designed, maintained, serviced, controlled, managed, monitored, created and operated” its streets; and City knew or should have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.