Sheeler

Sheeler v. Greystone Homes, Inc.

Good Law
113 Cal. App. 4th 908·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1764·2003 Daily Journal DAR 12867·6 Cal. Rptr. 3d 683·68 Cal. Comp. Cases 1810
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 26, 2003No. B162614California5,268 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Curry, J.

Summary judgment was granted in favor of defendant and respondent Greystone Industries, Inc. (Greystone) and against plaintiffs and appellants Jimmy and Esther Sheeler. We affirm.

RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The following facts are not in dispute; In February 2000, Jimmy Sheeler was an experienced masonry and tile worker with 30 years of experience. At the time, he was an employee of Roy Gerbitz Tile, a subcontractor at a construction site in Stevenson Ranch. Greystone was the general contractor at the site. On February 2, 2000, Sheeler was injured at the site. As a result of his injuries, he received workers’ compensation benefits.

On September 29, 2000, the Sheelers filed a complaint against Greystone, containing a negligence claim by Jimmy Sheeler, and a claim for loss of consortium by Esther Sheeler. The complaint alleged that Greystone negligently failed to “coordinate, construct, inspect, maintain, clean, protect, manage, control, and supervise the job site by allowing construction debris and other material to remain on” a staircase, and as a result, Sheeler tripped on debris while climbing the staircase.

On April 8, 2002, Greystone filed a motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.