Bensimon

Bensimon v. Superior Court

Good Law
113 Cal. App. 4th 1257·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1794·2003 Daily Journal DAR 13119·7 Cal. Rptr. 3d 151·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10417
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 4, 2003No. B171121California649 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Vogelmiriam, J.

Patrick Bensimon, the defendant in a breach of contract action brought by Tarrant Apparel Group, moved for summary judgment. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c.) 1 On September 22, 2003, the trial court denied the motion and (on September 23) mailed notice of its order to the parties. On October 2, Bensimon filed a motion for reconsideration (§ 1008), which was denied on October 29. On November 10, Bensimon filed a petition for a writ of mandate in which he asked us to compel the trial court to grant his motion for summary judgment. We deny the untimely petition, and publish this opinion because recent experience suggests the bar is unaware that a motion for reconsideration does not extend the jurisdictional time for a writ petition when the trial court has denied a motion for summary judgment.

DISCUSSION

Subdivision (m)(l) of section 437c provides that a summary judgment is an appealable judgment and that, “[u]pon entry of any order pursuant to [section 437c], except the entry of summary judgment, a party may, within 20 days after service upon him or her of a written notice of entry of the order, petition an appropriate reviewing court for a peremptory writ. If the notice is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.