Wolfe

People v. Wolfe

Good Law
114 Cal. App. 4th 177·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1845·2003 Daily Journal DAR 13485·7 Cal. Rptr. 3d 483·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10691
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 11, 2003No. E032675California3,795 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Richli, J.

Defendant Sebastian Wolfe lived with his mother in a trailer park. On May 9, 2001, a police officer saw several firearms in their trailer. On May 11, 2001, having learned that defendant had a misdemeanor conviction that made it illegal for him to possess a firearm, police officers searched the trailer. Defendant told them, “[M]y guns are in the light fixture[] above the kitchen . ...” In that light fixture, as well as elsewhere in the trailer, the police found sundry firearms.

A jury found defendant guilty on one count of possession of a firearm with a qualifying misdemeanor. (Pen. Code, § 12021, subd. (c)(1).) He was sentenced to three years’ probation, on terms including participation in the Mental Health Treatment Program.

In the published portion of this opinion, we hold that the trial court erred by failing to give a unanimity instruction. There is a split of opinion regarding the harmless error standard applicable to this error; we hold that the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard of Chapman v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 18 [ 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , 87 S.Ct. 824 ] (Chapman) applies. Finally, however, we hold that, even under this standard, the error was harmless.

In the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.