Weir

Moraga-Orinda Fire Protection District v. Weir

Good Law
10 Cal. Rptr. 3d 13·115 Cal. App. 4th 477·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 119·2004 Daily Journal DAR 1130·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 921
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 2004No. A101235California2,014 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Pakrilli, J.

This case arises from the trial court’s denial of a motion to recover attorney fees and costs under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. 1 We reverse.

Appellants are unincorporated associations of Orinda homeowners. They submitted a rebuttal argument for a voter information pamphlet regarding a proposed tax increase to fund improvements in the water flow to fire hydrants in Orinda. Respondent Moraga-Orinda Fire Protection District (the District) filed a mandamus petition seeking to strike or modify certain statements in the rebuttal. Three days later, the District filed an amended petition adding respondent Gene Gottfried, M.D., a Director of the District, as a petitioner. Appellants responded by challenging the District’s standing under Elections Code section 13313, 2 and arguing that the amended petition was not timely *480 filed. Appellants also moved to strike the petition as a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) under section 425.16.

The trial court denied the petition, ruling that the District lacked standing and its amended petition was untimely. The propriety of that ruling is not before us, as respondents did not appeal. The court set a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.