Martinez

People v. Martinez

Good Law
10 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751·116 Cal. App. 4th 753·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 288·2004 Daily Journal DAR 2967·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2038
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 5, 2004No. A103502California3,044 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Swager, J.

A gang registration requirement was imposed upon defendant pursuant to Penal Code section 186.30 as part of his sentence following revocation of probation and upon entry of a plea of no contest to auto burglary (Pen. Code, § 459). 1 We conclude that the evidence in the record does not support the finding that the crime was gang related, and strike the gang registration order.

STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 2

Case No. MCR 411232

Defendant was arrested on December 1, 2002, after he was discovered by a Santa Rosa police officer in a car with a 14-year-old girl. He subsequently admitted that he “had sex” with the girl, and knew “she was only 14.” The *757 arresting officer discovered that defendant “was on CYA parole” and was a “certified Sureño gang member.”

On December 17, 2002, defendant entered a negotiated no contest plea to a charge of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor (§ 261.5, subd. (c)). In accordance with the plea bargain, on January 22, 2003, he was placed on probation for 36 months, upon the condition, among others, that he not associate with known gang members, or wear gang attire or colors.

Case No. SCR 32763

At 11:42 p.m. on January 12,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.