Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Co. v. Superior Court

Good Law
11 Cal. Rptr. 3d 564·117 Cal. App. 4th 158·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 398·2004 Daily Journal DAR 3837·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2649
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 29, 2004No. D042574California3,436 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

McConnell, J.

Marcos Sawyer Salazar (Marcos), a minor, claims he developed asthma caused by toxic mold in the house in which he lived with his mother, Maria Angelina Casteneda (Casteneda). Casteneda and Marcos 1 sued the seller of the house, the seller’s broker Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Company Inc. (Coldwell Banker) and others, alleging they breached various duties of care, including fading to disclose the existence of microbial contamination. Coldwell Banker unsuccessfully demurred to Marcos’s complaint on the ground it did not owe him a duty of care because he was not a party to the real estate transaction. We conclude Marcos cannot *162 state a cause of action against Coldwell Banker and grant its petition for writ of mandate.

FACTUAL 2 AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Casteneda bought a house from Michael Behnke. Coldwell Banker was the listing agent in the sale. After Casteneda and Marcos moved into the house, Casteneda noticed a moldy smell in the kitchen and downstairs bathroom. An environmental test showed a dangerous level of mycotoxins and mold spores. The estimated cost to fix the problem was more than $25,000. The exposure to mold caused Casteneda and Marcos to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.