In re De Leon

Good Law
117 Cal. App. 4th 1116·13 Cal. Rptr. 3d 310·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 577·2004 Daily Journal DAR 4865·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3445
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 30, 2004No. B167727California2,546 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Klein, J.

A jury convicted Elvis Ponce De Leon of assault on a peace officer and possession of a controlled substance. (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (c); Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a).) In subsequent writ proceedings, the trial court set aside the conviction of possession of a controlled substance when it came to light during the Rampart investigation that the arresting officers may have used excessive force in this case. The trial court declined to set aside the conviction of assault on a peace officer. For the reasons stated below, we conclude the assault conviction also must be reversed. Accordingly, we grant the relief requested and remand the case for a new trial.

*1118 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

1. The trial.

Ponce De Leon was charged with two counts of robbery of Tito Mena, attempted robbery of Otilio Puentes, assault with a firearm on John Lidyoff, assault on Los Angeles Police Officer Melvin Boyd, possession Of a. controlled substance and possession of a firearm by a felon.

a. Prosecution’s evidence.

On May 22, 1997, a male approached Mena at a phone booth, simulated a weapon in his pocket and demanded Mena’s property. At the preliminary hearing, Mena…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.