BFGC Architects Planners, Inc. v. Forcum/Mackey Construction, Inc.

Bad Law
119 Cal. App. 4th 848·14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 721·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 979·2004 Daily Journal DAR 7480·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5466
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 21, 2004No. G032543California1,745 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Rylaarsdam, J.

Cross-complainant BFGC Architects Planners, Inc. (plaintiff) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of cross-defendants Forcum/Mackey Construction Inc. (Forcum) and S.C. Anderson, Inc. (Anderson) (collectively defendants) after their demurrers were sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiff contends the court erred by holding that its claims for implied indemnity required a predicate tort. We find the demurrers were correctly sustained without leave to amend and affirm.

FACTS

Porterville Unified School District (district) and plaintiff entered into a contract whereby plaintiff agreed to prepare architectural drawings for and supervise construction of a high school. District also entered into contracts with Forcum and Anderson to act as general contractors for the site phase and construction phase, respectively. In its complaint against plaintiff for breach of contract and professional negligence, district alleged that after construction was completed, Anderson submitted a claim to district for more than $11 *851 million, alleging “delays and disruptions stemming from [plaintiff’s] defective design . . . .” District paid Anderson just over $4 million to settle the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.