Petrou

Petrou v. South Coast Emergency Group

Good Law
119 Cal. App. 4th 1090·15 Cal. Rptr. 3d 64·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1011·2004 Daily Journal DAR 7699·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5757
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 25, 2004No. G031662California2,363 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Rylaarsdam, J.

Plaintiffs Tom T. and Barbara Petrou appeal from a judgment entered after the court dismissed their medical malpractice action when they were precluded from putting on expert testimony as to the standard of care. They contend the court erred when it ruled their expert witness was not qualified under Health & Safety Code section 1799.110, subdivision (c) (section 1799.110(c)) because he did not have substantial experience as an emergency room physician within five years of the date of trial and disallowed his testimony. (All further statutory references are to this code unless otherwise stated.) We conclude the five-year period set out in that statute is to be measured from the date of the alleged malpractice and therefore reverse the judgment.

FACTS

The Petrous filed a medical malpractice action against defendants David Allen Reid, M.D., and South Coast Emergency Group based on treatment Tom Petrou received from Reid in an emergency room in November 1999. In September 2001, plaintiffs designated Ronald Crowell, M.D., as their expert witness to testify as to the applicable standard of care in an emergency room. He is board certified in emergency medicine and was an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.