Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Nerissa H.

Good Law
121 Cal. App. 4th 1050·18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 74·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1386·2004 Daily Journal DAR 10565·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7845
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 24, 2004No. B172287California949 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Epstein, J.

Nerissa H. (Mother) and Earl L., Sr., (Father; collectively Parents) appeal from the order terminating their parental rights over Earl L. and Earllia L., which freed them for adoption.

Parents contend the juvenile court violated their rights to due process (U.S. Const., 14th Amend.) by requiring them to make an offer of proof before setting a contested hearing to determine whether the sibling exception (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(E)) 1 applied. They also contend that setting Earl L. and Earllia L. free for adoption would be detrimental in light of their strong bond with two older half siblings, Jamesha T. and Jesse T.

Based on our review of the record and applicable law, we affirm the order. In particular, we conclude that the offer of proof procedure set forth in our earlier decision of In re Tamika T. (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 1114 [ 118 Cal.Rptr.2d 873 ] applies to the sibling exception to termination of parental rights.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

Mother has five children. In descending order of age, they are Unesha L.; Jamesha T.; Jesse T.; Earl L.; and Earllia L. Jamesha T. and Jesse T. share the same father. Earl L. and Earllia L. also share the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.