Sutter County Human Services Agency v. Angel J.

Good Law
123 Cal. App. 4th 16·19 Cal. Rptr. 3d 752·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1726·2004 Daily Journal DAR 12651·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9248
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 15, 2004No. C046285California2,086 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Sims, J.

*18 Opinion

Angel J. (appellant), the mother of Kenneth M. and Katie M. (the minors), appeals from orders of the juvenile court terminating her parental rights. 1 (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 366.26, 395; undesignated statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.) Appellant contends the orders terminating her parental rights must be reversed because the juvenile court erred in denying her reunification services and by failing to ensure compliance with the notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). ( 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) 2 Agreeing with the latter claim only, we shall reverse the orders and remand the matter to the juvenile court for further proceedings.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On May 28, 2003, Sutter County Human Services Agency (HSA) filed original juvenile dependency petitions pursuant to section 300 on behalf of the minors. Those petitions alleged Katie had been the victim of child abuse, resulting in the minor’s suffering head and eye injuries. The petitions also alleged there was a substantial risk Kenneth would be abused, and that domestic violence occurred in the home. At the jurisdictional hearing, the juvenile court sustained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.