In re D. W.

Good Law
123 Cal. App. 4th 491·20 Cal. Rptr. 3d 274·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1787·2004 Daily Journal DAR 13027·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9540
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 2004No. G031779California3,786 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Leary, J.

Petitioner, D. W., 1 was ordered incarcerated pursuant to Penal Code section 1332 2 as a result of being adjudged an uncooperative material witness. D. W. argues she was illegally deprived of her liberty because she was denied counsel and the proper hearings required by the statute. D. W. also contends she was improperly found in contempt pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1209, subdivision (a)(9). We conclude both claims have merit. Petition granted.

iH íjí

Because D. W. raises two distinct procedural issues, we will first discuss her arguments with respect to section 1332. We will discuss her Code of Civil Procedure section 1209 argument anon.

Section 1332

FACTS

Steven Robert Miller was a defendant in a “Three Strikes” law case charged with first degree robbery, first degree burglary, the unlawful taking of a vehicle, and 10 prior strikes. At the time Miller committed the offenses, the prosecution believed he was involved in a relationship with D. W. She was, therefore, considered to be a material witness to Miller’s participation in the charged offenses.

*494 In March 2001, Miller’s case was set ready for jury trial. In anticipation of calling D. W. as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.